The Pledge to Sarah Safety App

Indiegogo has an active fundraiser for an app that will allow crew members to anonymously report safety violations on set. The app will be free once developed. The "Pledge to Sarah" Safety App is in the late camera assistant Sarah Jones's honor. You can support this fundraiser with as little as $1. As of the writing of this blog post, the project reached $2,942 of its $3,400 goal.

Please note there are no special perks for this fundraiser. However, our lives as crew members should not be monetized. If you believe sets should be as safe as possible, please consider supporting this campaign.

Happy Filmmaking!

Do I Smell a SCAM???: Working for Free

Kudos for LA Times and the Hollywood Reporter for shedding some light on this subject. Very few industries can get away with the whole "privilege-of-working-with-us-is-enough-compensation" as much as Entertainment Industries. These industries thrive on enthusiastic wannabe players who will do next to anything for that one lucky shot. Unfortunately, these prospective players drive down the market for others, as well as shoot themselves in the foot.

I'm all for volunteering and collaborating. It's a great way to network. But there is a very thin line between volunteering to help out and being used as free labor. It's so commonplace, many now-professionals even stress going the extra mile on these "free" positions in order to keep your foot in the door. As the practice spreads in other industries due to the economy, unemployed workers and the government are starting to question the legality of the so-called "adult internship."

Just as both articles point out, working for free for the direct financial benefit of a company is illegal. The "non-college intern" PA position on professional shoots has to stop. If the film cannot budget some type of compensation for you, then it probably will not help you advance your career. Be friendly and open to assignments, but be mindful.

Happy Filmmaking.

The Science of Filmmaking

I came across an interesting article in the LA-based free street periodical Brand X today. Under the title “Quantum Filmmaking,” there was a woman filmmaker named Valerie Weiss. Weiss transitioned from a biophysicist with a Harvard PhD to a filmmaker, currently in pre-production for her first film.

Many filmmakers have a “day job,” but this article demonstrates how one can use aspects and experiences in that day job in order to shape their creative streak. Weiss explains how scientists use creativity in order to form theories and hypotheses and take risks. She believes science and filmmaking should coincide, based on their career similarities. In that sense, Weiss used her background to her advantage.

When it comes to science, however, most filmmakers wing it. There are plenty of websites dedicated to so-called “movie physics.” Everything from warp speed, to flashing bullets, to window glass that shatters on impact, to mid-90s era Macbooks taking down alien motherships, to living blobs with a taste for human flesh. Even recently, Cracked readers played homage to film science. One cannot really blame filmmakers for the misconception since most audience members will suspend their disbelief for a good story.

Because of the overwhelming stereotypes of science and scientists in cinema, many foundations issue grants and awards to filmmakers who portray the field in a positive and groundbreaking light. The two career fields benefit from such a marriage because the filmmaker will receive the support needed for a project, and the scientific industry will receive a renewed interest from aspiring scholars. The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Grant, for example, grants current film students production and screenwriting funds in exchange for a non-stereotypical depiction of a scientist or engineer:

The one condition of all submissions is that they portray science and/or scientists in realistic, non-stereotypical ways. They do not necessarily have to be sympathetic characters, and the story does not have to be strictly about science. Sloan is interested in reading about scientists as human beings whether they’re fallible or heroic. The stories can be totally fiction or based on an actual event or person.

For accuracy, the scripts have to be approved by an actual scientist, such as a faculty member of the awarding university. Weiss joined a program called the Catalyst Workshop, sponsored by AFI. The program only takes professional scientists interested in filmmaking and is partially funded by the US Department of Defense.

One thing is for certain, real or not, you can always count on cinema to make science cool. Think about all the times CSI must have blown your mind.

Happy Filmmaking!

Can Indies survive the bear market?

That is the question. Whereas most economists call the Hollywood film industry "recession-proof," the opposite exists for us small guys, the indie film geeks. Over at fivesprockets.com, blogger Ann Curry pleas with her readers to support those who give us more cinematic bang for our buck.

Indie filmmaking is similar to other small business. In a bear market, they are the first to fold, while the public still supports the big guys, deemed "too big to fail." Unlike other small businesses, however, the success of production companies depend more so on the public's opinion of its entertainment, rather than any inherent demand or need. John Q. Public may still go to blockbuster superhero movie rather than small art house film because he feels art house films do not speak to him or for him.

Filmmaking is an expensive and elitist endeavor, but as the nation's most recognizable artform, it preserves our American way of life. Who says it should only be for the studios?

Personally, I don't let my lack of funds or resources stop me from reaching my filmmaking goals. One just has to be smart and one step ahead of the snake oil salesmen on craigslist and the like.

Happy Filmmaking.